WESTERN SEMINARY SAN JOSE
New Testament Studies 3
BLS 503YS; 2 credit hours
Gary Tuck, Ph.D., Professor
408-356-6889, x417; garytuck@westernseminary.edu
Fall 2004
SYLLABUS
Course Description
See Catalog.
Recommended prerequisites: DBS 506, BLS 501, 502, 503X. 2 hours.
Course Goals
To be a competent minister of God’s Word one must "know the major themes and developments within biblical history to understand the ‘big picture’ of God’s redemptive program." Toward that end this course, the sixth of a six-course sequence (BLS 501X,Y, 502X,Y, 503X,Y) that surveys the content of all 66 books of the canon, is designed to lead the student to attain a basic cognitive grasp of the literature, to grow more positive in his emotional response to the text and its Author, and to direct the student toward ever more faithful implementation of its demands, both explicit and implicit.
Course Objectives
Cognitive: As a result of this course the student should
Affective: It is hoped that as a result of this course the student would
Volitive: It is hoped that as a result of this course the student would
Textbooks
Required: (Hotlinked to Amazon.com)
Carson, D.A., Douglas Moo, and Leon Morris. An Introduction to the New Testament. Zondervan, 1992.
Dictionary of Paul and His Letters. Gerald F. Hawthorne, Ralph P. Martin, and Daniel G. Reid, eds. IVP, 1993. Dictionary of the Later New Testament and its Developments. Ralph P. Martin and Peter Davids, eds. IVP, 1997.Tuck, Gary. "An Analysis of the Books of the New Testament."
Recommended:
Bruce, F.F. New Testament History. Garden City: Anchor Books, 1972.
Expositor’s Bible Commentary, The. Frank E. Gaebelein, ed. Vol. 1, "Introductory Articles." Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1979.
House, H. Wayne. Chronological and Background Charts of the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1981.
Ladd, G.E., A Theology of the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1974.
The NET Bible.
Course Requirements
Attend and participate actively in all class sessions. This is stated and listed first because it reflects the seminary’s and the professor’s values. Let him who has ears hear what the prof saith to the students!
Let me try to say it another way. You have a lifetime ahead of you for ministry; but this class is once in a lifetime for you, only six Saturday mornings. When you have a schedule conflict, this is to be your top priority. Each assignment should be completed before the class session so that you will be able to participate in and benefit from the class discussions.
See catalog (p. 27) for Seminary attendance expectations. Since every class meeting is 17% (!) of the course, absences are magnified. Absence from two entire class dates will result in failure, illness and family tragedy being the only exceptional excuses.
Further, if you do have to miss a class, you are still held responsible for the class material, both lecture content and assignment instructions. You need to make arrangements in advance with a classmate for any notes or audiotaping.
Reading
Writing
- content summary for each chapter
(raw; concise, no complete sentences, comprehensive, memory jogger; selective, but not randomly so; not an outline; do your own work—do not just borrow some Bible’s section headings);
- 5 significant themes traced (two steps) through the book
FAITH should include believe, unbelief, obey, disobey (Heb 2:18f; 3:1-6), faithful, unfaithful, endure (?), abide (?), etc.; ‘Kingdom’ and ‘King’ are one theme, not two; a common problem in "tracing" is poorly defined or understood themes; and avoid being too broad (‘Justification’ in Rom 2:1-25) and too narrow (‘Sin’ in Rom 1:18-32); "tracing" also functions as a check on the importance of a theme.
- write a one-page analytical comparison of the outlines provided, the basis of which is their intrinsic faithfulness to the author’s thought and structure;
that is, evaluate the exegetical accuracy of each outline (overlook the smoothness/readability issues): list "strengths … weaknesses" of each; address (1) breaks (seams), (2) headings: critique as if measured against an assumed ideal, authorial structure.
- and a subject-complement message statement (NOT identical to "Subject-Purpose"!) for the whole book.
The subject is the answer to the question, What is the author talking about, the main topic of the book? It is not a complete sentence; it is the subject of a sentence. Do not say, "[Author or Book] teaches …," or other situation-specific points, which are more characteristic of a Subject-Purpose statement.
The complement is the answer to the question, What does the author say about the subject? It is not a complete sentence either; it is the completion of the sentence begun by the subject. It is not a dependent clause, such as, "who gave his life …"
These need to be the fruit of serious, "quality" work. Each half statement (S and C) needs then to be accompanied by a paragraph of ‘commentary’ on your S/C. Show how the elements of your S/C are actually in the text and that both S and C cover the whole epistle (so supply specific chapter:verse references); but this must be in complete sentences and thesis-type paragraphs. This is as much a check for you—to see that your statement is defensible—as for the reader. These must also be single: that is, no multiple subjects or complements joined by "and" or "so that."
I have provided grade sheets for these assignments with this syllabus. Failure to turn in a grade sheet with each assignment will result in a full letter grade reduction, without mercy!
My concern in these writing assignments is that you interact with the biblical text itself! Therefore you are permitted to consult secondary, interpretive resources only minimally; I want you to practice wrestling with the text on your own. In that work my concern is that you perceive the big picture, appraising which are the more significant observations. You need also to demonstrate a grasp of the synthetic, ‘macro-exegetical’ approach modeled in class and my notes. At this level you must be doing excellent work at both observing and interpreting.
You also need to understand that your task is to develop and disclose the author’s message. Good devotions are no substitute for solid literary criticism in these papers.
In all essay-type papers you must create appropriate introductions and conclusions. That is, clue your reader in to the issue (intro) and give him a satisfying ‘landing’ that clarifies what you want him to remember (concl). In the body of the paper, use section headings: these not only aid your reader to follow your thought, but discipline you to stay focused. Also, write strategically, with focus; don’t just throw in everything you know. And do not ever introduce new data in a conclusion!!!
Use scripture quotations sparingly and strategically. Focus on explanation and interpretation. I love God’s Word, but in your papers I want to read what you think it says. It is not enough to pull quotes; you must demonstrate that you understand the logic of the biblical authors. But you must also support your general statements with details: cite and list verses.
You are responsible to read and understand and follow the assignments as described in class. Written products that deviate in direction from the assignment descriptions will be penalized accordingly. You need also to be learning to present essays in Turabian or near-Turabian format.
My expectation is that you will spend approximately equal time on reading and writing assignments. For a 2-unit class that ‘outside-of-class’ component comes to 60-ish hours for the semester, an average of 5 hours per week, 10 hours per major written assignment.
For privacy please include a Title Page with every assignment. For the staff that will return your graded papers to your boxes, include your box number on every assignment, top right corner.
All work must reflect Master’s Level use of the English Language. Plagiarism will result in failure of the first assignment so discovered. A second instance will result in failure in the course. If you are unsure what constitutes plagiarism, look it up in a dictionary and the seminary catalog, p. 32; after that, you may ask the prof.
Work with a study-buddy is encouraged. (Special note to spouses: each must do his/her own work. When possible, do different papers, reports.)
Grading
|
Reading log |
5% |
|
Reading reports |
15% |
|
Chart, Essay papers |
(@ 25% =) 50% |
|
Revelation paper |
30% |
Tentative Course Outline
|
Class Session |
Class Date |
Topic & Assignment |
|
1 |
Sept 13, 18 |
Course Introduction; NT backgrounds, Epistolary genre, Paul; Romans |
|
2 |
Sept 27, Oct 2 |
Romans, Ephesians, Colossians, Philemon |
|
3 |
Oct 18, 16 |
Philippians, 1-2 Timothy, Titus |
|
4 |
Oct 25, 30 |
Hebrews, James |
|
5 |
Nov 8, 13 |
1 Peter, Revelation |
|
6 |
Nov 22, Dec 4 |
Revelation, 1-3 John, 2 Peter, Jude |
|
No class |
Dec 6, 11 |
Due: Revelation Paper |
reading log
I fulfilled the reading assignments as indicated below (X = on time, O = late):
|
Text |
Tuck |
Carson |
|
|
Romans |
_______ |
_______ |
_______ |
|
Ephesians |
_______ |
_______ |
_______ |
|
Colossians |
_______ |
_______ |
_______ |
|
Philemon |
_______ |
_______ |
_______ |
|
Philippians |
_______ |
_______ |
_______ |
|
1 Tim |
_______ |
_______ |
_______ |
|
2 Tim |
_______ |
_______ |
_______ |
|
Titus |
_______ |
_______ |
_______ |
|
Hebrews |
_______ |
_______ |
_______ |
|
James |
_______ |
_______ |
_______ |
|
1 Peter |
_______ |
_______ |
_______ |
|
2 Peter |
_______ |
_______ |
_______ |
|
Jude |
_______ |
_______ |
_______ |
|
1 John |
_______ |
_______ |
_______ |
|
2 John |
_______ |
_______ |
_______ |
|
3 John |
_______ |
_______ |
_______ |
|
Revelation |
_______ |
_______ |
_______ |
|
Carson (pp 215-37, 487-500) |
_______ |
||
|
DPHL / DLNT (20 pp) |
Title of Article |
(# pages) |
|
|
Dictionaries (20 pp) |
|||
|
Title of Resource |
|||
Name __________________________ Signature __________________________
Name
__________________________ Book: Romans|
Chapter headings |
/25 |
|
|
Themes |
/20 |
|
|
Themes traced |
/15 |
|
|
Outline |
/20 |
|
|
Subj-Compl |
/20 |
|
Form |
/4 |
|
|
____ |
||
|
Total |
/100 |
|