Matthew 24 is one of those perplexing biblical passages since Jesus seems to waffle between very specific timed warnings and “Even I don’t know the date.” In preparing to preach the sermon, I read RT France’s Matthew section in the New Bible Commentary and it gave me a different and better perspective on 24:29-35. Now, mind you, this change happened in the final moments of getting everything into my head, days after the Power Point and sermon outline went in. And now a key interpretation changes!
Matthew 24 is Jesus answering the disciples’ questions: “When will the Temple be destroyed?” “What will be the signs of Your coming?” Jesus begins by telling them there will be many terrors — false messiahs, wars, hostilities, famines, earthquakes – but cautions them against giving in to deception or fear, for that sort of thing will typify the whole time. It is not the end of the age or the failure of Jesus (though it may be the failure of the religion, Christianity). In all these things, the gospel will be proclaimed and the kingdom will be real, even if like yeast. Then He gives signs of the destruction of the Temple – the arrival of the abomination which turns out to be Titus. There are recognizable signs of this and Christians are warned to get out of town, which they did in 66 AD. Those are the days of terrible tribulation.
I thought verse 29 began speaking of the second question, the coming of Jesus with cosmic signs, leading up to “this generation will not pass away before all these things happen.” This is very difficult since Jesus did not come back in that generation. But France took me to what I have dedicated myself to: interpret NT symbols by how they are used in the OT. He observes that the language of sun darkening and stars falling comes from Isaiah 13 and 34. There it speaks of the fall of Babylon which happened in 539 BC, not the end of the times. The Son of Man language of v. 30 is from Daniel 7 where it is enthronement or exaltation of Messiah rather than the second coming of Messiah. Using that perspective means that the section from Matthew 24:29-35 is speaking to the change from God meeting humans at the Jerusalem Temple to Him meeting us in One greater than the Temple, i.e., Jesus. The long promised New Covenant is inaugurated, Messiah is anointed King and Messiah, and the time of the Jerusalem Temple is ended. The language uses powerful images from the OT to help us see that change which is typified by the destruction of the Temple is “cosmic!”
That means the generation of verse 34 is the people listening to Him as He speaks the prophecy. It is about the time of the destruction of the Temple. There are signs of that event which actually come less than 40 years later, just as Jesus said.
Verse 36 begins speaking of the second coming, referred to specifically as the parousia in verse 37. Unlike the destruction of the Temple, there are no signs of that event. Even Jesus, in His incarnate state where He has laid aside the use of His divine powers to live as a perfectly Spirit filled human, does not know. It is like a thief in the night. We are ready not because we have some magic decoder ring to predict the date, but because we are doing the consistent work of living and declaring the reality of the kingdom.
You can hear the sermon, Living Future, here: http://sdrv.ms/15IA0PI