Revival tent

The Three Rs of Transformation

Twice a year, Western Seminary produces a magazine addressing key themes of interest to ministry leaders. The most recent issue focused on spiritual renewal in our own lives and our churches. You can read the feature article below. Other articles in the magazine address personal transformation, the need for revival in Uganda, revival through college ministry, and historic perspectives on renewal/revival, as well as articles on various aspects of the seminary today. Please feel free to check out this issues and past issues of the magazine on the seminary’s Publications page.

Sawdust on the floor. Benches once neatly arrayed, now pushed hastily aside, tracing a chaotic maze through the crowd of people swaying and dancing under the high-peaked tent. Light streaming from the tent’s door into the warm summer evening where more people wait for a small taste of what’s happening within. Taut ropes quivering as thousands of feet stomp to the music.

Revival has come to town.

At least, it looks like a revival. Sawdust? Check. Big crowd? Check. Dancing and singing? Check. All we need now is some preaching, confessing, and maybe a little feinting. Then we’ll be all set.

After all, that’s what a revival is. Right?

Our Revival Roots

Evangelicalism has always had a deep concern for the transformation of individual Christians and the Church itself. Drawing on currents already present in pietism and among the Puritans, early evangelicals like Jonathan Edwards, the Wesley brothers, and George Whitefield feared for a Christianity that seemed to have lost its vitality. People were just going through the motions. They attended church, took communion, and read their Bibles. But there was no life. No change. No transformation. People, churches, and entire communities went on about their business, everyday lives untouched by the Gospel.

And that can’t be. Jesus promised that his people would be filled with the Spirit, ambassadors of the Gospel, harbingers of his Kingdom. We are supposed to be God’s image bearers in the world, manifesting his glory everywhere. We’re supposed to be different.

Something was wrong.

So these early evangelicals prayed, preached, worked, and hoped for something more. Real change. Their desire was that God would come and transform his people so that they would live in the world as he intended. They sought revival.

And evangelicals pursued revival into the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries as well. The First Great Awakening gave way to the Second, Third, and even Fourth Great Awakenings, every generation praying for God’s empowering presence to renew his people for more vital living and more faithful ministry in the world. This emphasis on “renewal through revival” is part of the DNA of evangelicalism.

Two Key Questions

But, despite this general agreement, evangelicalism has struggled to understand exactly what this means. And we’ve had a particularly difficult time answering two fundamental questions.

Is revival lasting or temporary?

Some evangelicals focus on the fact that we live in a broken world. And, in this fallen existence, we will always encounter times of sustained, spiritual dryness. The best we can hope is that God will occasionally pour out his spirit onto our dry ground, allowing the plants to sprout and the flowers to bloom for a time, before the dry heat of the desert returns.

But other evangelicals see revival as more lasting. For them, the promise of real change isn’t fleeting. Rather than seeing revival as a sudden rainstorm, they picture it as a spring continually flowing up from the ground to sustain new life in an otherwise barren land.

Is revival “miraculous” or “natural”?

A related question has to do with the source of true revival. Now, we have to be a little careful here because all evangelicals agree that true revival is “miraculous” in the sense that ultimately it comes from God. No one argues that revival is something we simply produce on our own.

But evangelicals do disagree on exactly how to understand the relationship between the divine and the human in producing revival. For many evangelicals, revival is a miracle along the same lines as bringing someone back from the dead. The dead person doesn’t contribute much to the process. So renewing them to life must be a gift from the outside. Others can pray, pleading with God to offer the gift. But in the end, renewal is a miraculous gift.

Others agree that revival is a gift, but they prefer a different analogy. For them, revival is more like a plant growing in your garden. The fact that the plant exists and grows at all is a gift from God. But to make the plant grow, the gardener needs to work hard: cultivating, planting, weeding, feeding, and watering. And, under normal circumstances, God will not withhold the miraculous gift of life when his people carry out these tasks faithfully.

Different answers to these two questions will give you very different pictures of revival. Is revival temporary and “supernatural,” like the raising of Lazarus? Or is revival sustained and “natural,” like a farmer growing crops? And, of course, we could also combine the options and argue for something that is sustained and supernatural (like the New England Patriots) or temporary and natural (like any plant I’ve ever tried to grow).

The Three Rs

I think that a lot of the confusion comes from the fact that we’re using one term, revival, to describe at least three different things. So it may help if we make some important distinctions.


Nothing is more pathetic than a child’s toy when the batteries are running low: it slows down; the already annoying music turns into a mind-numbing warble; and the lights flicker erratically like a firefly with a bad fuse. I think we all feel like that at times. We run down spiritually, emotionally, physically, and even missionally, needing to be reminded and renewed so we can be reengaged in what the Gospel is all about. We sometimes need to have the “joy of your salvation” restored (Ps. 51:12) so God can continue the process of renewing us in his image (2 Cor. 4:16). Praise God for rechargeable batteries.

Renewal refers to the revitalization of God’s people for faithful life and ministry. And, in this way, it’s distinct from rebirth, which is a word that we should reserve for the beginning of one’s Christian journey. But renewal shares one common characteristic with rebirth: it’s a gift. A battery does not recharge itself, and life does not arise on its own. Renewal, as the overall process of revitalizing God’s people, always comes as a gift of God’s grace.


Even though renewal is always a gift, God’s people have long recognized the importance of working faithfully to address our imperfections and weaknesses. That’s reformation: the ongoing practice of bringing every aspect of life and ministry into greater conformity with the Gospel. And whether it’s Paul calling for reform in the Corinthian church, the early church working toward reform in a series worldwide councils, the medieval church with its many reform movements, or the Protestant Reformation itself, reform efforts have always been with us. Because, of course, reformation didn’t end in the sixteenth century. It continues today as God’s people labor to address their flawed attempts at faithfulness.

Does this mean that reformation stands at odds with renewal? By no means. The Gospel of grace entails neither quietism nor passivism. We are called to action. Reformation by itself cannot produce renewal any more than going to church alone can produce sanctification. But they are both expressions of Christian faithfulness that God uses in the process of growing and renewing his people.


If “reformation” is the active and ongoing process by which God’s people seek to live faithfully in light of the Gospel, then we can reserve the term revival for those more special occasions in which God uniquely empowers a particular group of people for Gospel-centered living.

Throughout the Old Testament, we can see God’s spirit at work rejuveniting his people and drawing them to himself again (e.g. Exod. 4:29-31; 1 Sam. 7:1-4; 2 Chron. 15:1-5; 29-31; Ezra 5-6). And, of course, we can’t forget about Pentecost, the remarkable outpouring of the Spirit in fulfilmment of Old Testament prophecy to indwell and empower God’s people for Gospel ministry. Revival.

And God hasn’t stopped reviving his people. Whether we’re talking about a Great Awakening that sweeps across an entire country, or a special work of God in a particular congregation, revival renews God’s people for carrying out God’s purposes in God’s world.

Grounded in the Gospel

So, returning to the two questions I asked above, are we talking about something that is lasting or temporary, supernatural or natural? Yes, we are. Renewal is all of the above.

And what holds it all together is the Gospel. Overemphasize reformation and we’ll approach the church and the Christian life as a task that must be accomplished, a goal we can achieve if we just work hard enough. Down that road lie pride, frustration, and eventually exhaustion.

Overemphasize revival and we’ll approach the Christian life as something that can only be truly lived during times of heightened excitement, passion, and felt empowerment, something that must be continually stirred up and sought after. And down that road lie pride, frustration, and eventually exhaustion.

Two different roads. Same tragic end.

The Gospel rejects both approaches because it recognizes that true renewal is always a gift of God, but it is one that involves his empowering Spirit and our faithful response. In the end, sustained transformation, both personal and corporate, involves our renewal through both reformation and revival.

About Marc Cortez

Theology Prof at Wheaton College, husband, father, & blogger, who loves theology, church history, ministry, pop culture, books, and life in general.

7 thoughts on “The Three Rs of Transformation

  1. I agree with plenty of what you’ve said. But “taught ropes”? 🙂 …I know it’s difficult generating good, thoughtful, prayerful blog material every day, but it might be a good idea to run each Transformed entry past one more set of eyes before it’s posted….!

  2. Shoot. They even caught and changed that when it went into the magazine, but I never change the digital version that I had. I hate it when I do that.

    Thanks for catching that. I’ve updated the post now.

    1. Well, academic editing and reviewing are significant parts of my life, so I tend to find such mistakes pretty quickly (except in my own work, of course — we’re all better at editing others’ writing than our own!).

  3. Marc-

    Excellent article. It would seem that a number of churches need this sort of clarification. My own church has been intently discussing revival in the church, but not with this sort of clarity. I will be passing this own to my own ministry teams and pastors.


  4. These are good things to discuss! I have been thinking along these lines and have been frustrated sometimes when Christianity has been reduced to a 12 step self-improvement process.

    Is not all of our salvation of grace including sanctification? Aren’t we living in the age of the Spirit working through the church? Christ lived about thirty years while lepers went uncured, sinners unforgiven and dead people remained unraised.

    When He was filled with the Spirit, His public ministry began and was empowered by the Spirit, since He had voluntarily emptied Himself of all such personal powers. He never stopped being God but His example of doing God’s work through the power of the Spirit has a great lesson for us today as much of our preaching (unfortunately) boils down to urging spiritually malnourished Christians to make every effort to improve their flesh.

    I am not suggesting we need signs and miracles as evidence of the Spirit’s presence as I believe those were dispensational in nature to alert Israel that her King had arrived on the scene. Nor do I say that miracles cannot occur in accordance with the Spirit working.

    But the real need is for preachers and teachers to be filled with the Spirit especially while giving out the Gospel and the church teachings that go with it! See Peter for an example of same in Acts 2. But notice in Galatians 3 that Peter lost his courage (again) which points to the fact that we need to implore God’s Spirit every day to use us and lead us.

    Also, it is the absence of visual evidence in a Christian’s life that the Spirit is active in that individual that leads some to the unscriptural position that one can lose eternal salvation after all.

    What can be lost is a present salvation from the power of sin within every believer and in the world by creeping unbelief unopposed by scripture reading, prayer, service and fellowship via the Spirit!. So “be filled with the Spirit”!

    God bless, Dennis Clough

Comments are closed.